590
SMBC [2012-02-02] (www.smbc-comics.com)

Bonus panel:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 110 points 4 months ago

A bit sad that this is still relevant 12 years later.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 4 months ago

Those supposedly outrageous counter examples are much less unheard of though.

[-] leverage@lemdro.id 2 points 4 months ago

Because those are beaches of the 4th amendment, so of course you don't see that happen very often. That's the point being made.

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The person you're replying to is saying that those breaches of the 4th amendment are less absurd now than they were at the time the comic was written

[-] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 4 months ago

much less unheard of

Don’t fail to not use double negatives!

No wonder the responder didn’t unsuccessfully misunderstand the sentence.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
590 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12411 readers
3960 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS