590
SMBC [2012-02-02] (www.smbc-comics.com)

Bonus panel:

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 110 points 10 months ago

A bit sad that this is still relevant 12 years later.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 10 months ago

Those supposedly outrageous counter examples are much less unheard of though.

[-] leverage@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

Because those are beaches of the 4th amendment, so of course you don't see that happen very often. That's the point being made.

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The person you're replying to is saying that those breaches of the 4th amendment are less absurd now than they were at the time the comic was written

[-] pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 10 months ago

much less unheard of

Don’t fail to not use double negatives!

No wonder the responder didn’t unsuccessfully misunderstand the sentence.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

The only reason the physical stuff doesn’t happen is because it’s a logistical nightmare to perform it, but no one would bat an eye lash at the ethics of it. Simply, they would if they could 🤷‍♀️

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
590 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

16674 readers
1703 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS