-12
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by makeasnek@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

On P2P payments from their FAQ: "While the payment appears to be directly between wallets, technically the operation is intermediated by the payment service provider which will typically be legally required to identify the recipient of the funds before allowing the transaction to complete."

How about, no? How about me paying €50 to my friend for fixing my bike doesn’t need to be intermediated, KYCed, and blocked if they don't approve of it or know who the recipient is? How about it’s none of the government’s business how I split the bill at dinner with friends? This level of surveillance is madness, especially coming from an app that touts "privacy" as a feature.

GNU Taler is a trojan horse to enable CBDC adoption. They are the friendly face to an absolutely terrifying level of government control in our lives funded by the same government that tries every year to implement chat control. Imagine your least favourite political party gaining power. Now imagine they can see and control every transaction you make. No thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kbal@fedia.io 55 points 4 months ago

GNU Taler is not your enemy. It may not solve every problem you'd like it to, but its adoption by the masses would be a vast improvement in privacy compared to the current state of commerce in every country where it has the slightest chance of happening any time soon.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I have a feeling its adoption would bring the end of cash a big step closer.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 10 points 4 months ago

The suggestions like this also scare me in that it might require you to carry a smartphone all the time for things as basic as payment.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago

This is totally unrelated to GNU Taler though, and if it comes to that you will be happy to have GNU Taler as an privacy preserving option.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

When it comes to in-person payment, would Taler be usable without a mobile device? Say, with just a card like normal banking? I would have it much rather coexist with cash anyway.

But yea, sounds like an improvement when it comes to online payments.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The person accepting the money needs online access, or at least some sort of way to receive a validation code. As for the buyer, I think currently there is no implementation of it, but according to my understanding of it it would be technically possible to load Taler tokens on a card chip and use them from that.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Ah, that does make it better but still concerning - that would stop ME from also being paid in cash)

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 months ago

Not any closer than already existing commercial cashless payment solutions (which are much, much worse for privacy).

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
-12 points (45.8% liked)

Privacy

32165 readers
622 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS