460
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 180 points 4 months ago

Every gun owner thinks they're a responsible gun owner.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 53 points 4 months ago

Loaded gun in a car door pocket? I don't think these people considered themselves responsible gun owners.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 93 points 4 months ago

No, I think they did. That's the problem.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 60 points 4 months ago

They probably considered themselves responsible parents as well.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

The point is what people claim to be and what people are, are different things.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What they claim and what they believe.

[-] tamal3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It's terrifyingly common where i live, though people who do it think it's common sense self-protection.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Here's a story for you. I've only really held a gun once, at a camp riflery range (very small calibers). I still end up doing a fair amount of gun research for understanding gun debates / safety practices, research for fiction where characters have to talk about guns, etc.

I have had to correct other Reddit users that are gun owners, about the workings of basic single-action revolvers, in a very deep/long thread. I briefly doubted myself and checked my own sources, and yes, I was correct and the gun owner was persisting off the idea I was wrong. I'm sure there's some responsible owners out there, but the fact there are so many bull-headed idiots about their guns, who still say they're responsible, should scare anyone.

The specific topic, if you're interested, was on the situation where an old-style revolver is loaded and cocked by an inexperienced user, who then wants to safely decock/unload the gun without firing it (at that point, the cylinder is locked so basic approaches won't work). Feel free to look it up - the approach needed there is pretty damn stupid.

[-] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 months ago

I don't handle guns, I just like westerns and play too many video games:

Don't you have to hold the hammer while you pull the trigger to decock it? The trigger unlocks it, but because you're holding the hammer it doesn't strike the shell?

So in order to safely disarm you have to pull the trigger, which sure sounds like an accident waiting to happen.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Exactly right. It’s possible there are some newer revolver models that have fixed that quirk of design, but that’s been true of all the ones I looked up YouTube videos on.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, modern ones have a decocker to fix that problem. I've never looked up how they work exactly. I do know that some revolvers also have a little piece that comes up to block the hammer from striking.

The historic design is certainly unsafe, but in those days, guns were rare and expensive enough that if you had one, you were already going to be trained on it. (Also, compared to a semi-auto pistol slide spring, revolver hammer springs are surprisingly weak. The only time I've had to do it, in a safety class, I was using so much force to hold the hammer up, I didn't realize I had to let off to let it down.)

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I had a girlfriends father insist on taking the whole family to the gun range as a "fun day out thing". Not my thing, but why say no to new experience? Besides her dad had always openly carried so it was clearly something HE was into, so being invited to family time with him felt like a kindness

But oh joy, was I thankful that a gun instructor was there, literally everything her dad said was corrected. From hand placement, to how to load to how to stand. The guy nearly kicked dad off the range at one point for having a loaded gun facing his kid.

Thankfully I never had to suffer his company since we broke up later, but it was a very eye opening experince. Being INTO guns definitely does not correlate with safe usage.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

These people also left their 2 year old in the car by himself while they shopped.

These people are fucking morons, gun or no gun.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Agreed. There are plenty of morons among the gun owners who consider themselves responsible gun owners.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

I wonder what percentage actually are.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Whatever it is, it's probably at least 25% less than the NRA claim.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 months ago

Sure, sure, but not every gun owner leaves their gun loaded and unsecured in a car with their unsupervised young child.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

And yet these ones did. And considered themselves responsible the entire time.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

I guarantee you they don't think that way now.

I actually know someone something similar happened to and even years later half the house was basically a shrine to the kid.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Yup. But until that toddler's corpse was found, they considered themselves to be responsible gun owners.

And gun nuts counted them as responsible by default until that instant as well.

load more comments (31 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
460 points (97.7% liked)

News

23397 readers
1749 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS