40
RFC: Cross Platform Password Manager
(lemmy.radio)
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
KeePass, and more specifically the KeePassXC (desktop) and KeePassDX (Android) ports.
My wife and I have shared a single KeePass database for about 15 years now and I couldn't imagine switching to anything else.
My reasons have remained the same over the years:
I would never entrust the management of my credentials to a 3rd party online service. They're an easy target (it's only a matter of when, not if they are breached), and they could go out of business at any time.
We don't use cloud storage for anything these days, but we keep the KP database (and many other things) synced across more than 7 devices using SyncThing, another amazing FOSS project.
+1 for KeePassXC
Same setup as yours, runs really well.
Piggybacking on the comment. I also use syncthing to sync my keepass containers. Have you encountered duplication of database files (e.g.
filename-sync-conflict-*
), and if so, how have you solved them? I simply merge the files through KeepassXC when it happens.That used to happen to us before we started using SyncThing (and before we had data plans on our phones).
By the time we migrated to it, we had a home server running 24/7 and this ensured that at least one device in the chain was always online, had the latest version of the database, and pushed it to other devices as they came online. Our phones also have data plans now, so things generally sync in realtime which helps avoid issues.
If you don't have at least one always-online device, I think the next easiest way to avoid sync conflicts is to modify the database from one designated device. That way even if a conflict does arise, you'll know which device is always correct.
For resolving the conflicts, I would open both databases, sort by modified, and review the latest changes in each.