155
submitted 4 months ago by ray@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

To be clear I'm not giving them a pass. They are choosing to damage the environment and accelerate climate change in order to be a tax haven for the ultra-wealthy. They could absolutely find another more sustainable way to find the government if they wanted, and deserve to be criticized for the choices they've made.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They could absolutely find another more sustainable way to find the government if they wanted

You mean like building the largest Wind Farm in the United States and possibly the world?

How about we retire coal plants and replace them with next-gen Small Modular Nuclear Reactors?

We could also build really large solar farms on all this empty land we have.

Wyoming re-wrote it's tax code over a decade ago so that all power generation in the State is taxed. It's been busy since then expanding transmission lines and smacking down anyone who tries to stop the build out of green power. So yeah, it has been working on environmentally sustainable ways to fund the Government.

Our University is also a leader in Carbon Sequestration Technology and we're building the worlds largest Carbon Sequestration project.

There's a lot more going on around energy production in Wyoming than most people know about.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

While that's all true, it's also true that Wyoming today has the highest CO2 per capita production in the US at 96.4 tons.

The re-writing of the tax code you mentioned created the "Cowboy Cocktail", making Wyoming a tax haven for billionaires and enabling money laundering.

They are taking some small, slow steps towards mitigating the damage they have been doing for decades and are continuing for the foreseeable future.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Wyoming today has the highest CO2 per capita production

Sounds like that's largely because they are the top coal producing state (40% of US coal). In 2023, 71% of power generation was from coal. 23% was from renewables, with about 90% of that coming from wind. But yeah, coal's just going to produce a lot more CO2, even compared to other fossil fuels.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Um... Yes. Just to be clear, I am advocating that Wyoming produce less coal.

And for the US (the whole world really) to consume less.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5234 readers
8 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS