141
Yeah I read theory (m.media-amazon.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

You either haven't read my posts or are intentionally misreading them

There's things we must do to survive, and there's things we can do ignoring the survival and well-being of others

If the only way to win is to become the oppressors, we lose by default

[-] Cowbee@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You either haven't read my posts or are intentionally misreading them

On the contrary, I have dutifuly tried to engage as forthright and honestly with you as possible. I respect you as a fellow leftist, I just disagree with your attatchment to Moralism. Sadly, you haven't taken the time to respond to the points I have made, at least not directly.

There's things we must do to survive, and there's things we can do ignoring the survival and well-being of others

Then tie Proletarian's meager investments, which pale in comparison to the oceans of wealth taken from the Proletariat, to ignoring the survival and well-being of others. A proletarian taking a meager bucket back from the wealth stolen from them does not change their position with respect to their fellow Proletarians, nor does it impact the dialectical contradiction between the Proletariat and Bourgeoisie.

If the only way to win is to become the oppressors, we lose by default

Not a single person here is claiming that the path to Socialism is via Proletarians individually investing, neither does investing so that you may eventually retire mean you are no longer a wage slave.

Never forget that Communism is the Doctrine of the Conditions of the Liberation of the Proletariat. The Proletariat will use the tools at its disposal to its advantage, regardless of individuals with "principles" rejecting them. Communism is not a guideline on how to be a proper Worker within Capitalism, but a path to move beyond Capitalism. Harm reduction is good, but focusing on vague, arbitrary levels of acceptability based on nothing other than vibes is missing the forest for the trees.

I think you should step away from the keyboard for a bit, I think you've gotten pretty heated in this thread and seem to be replying to everyone. I think it would be beneficial for you to take a break and come back later, though don't confuse this for me telling you what to do. I don't know what you've got going on right now.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

What you don't seem to be understanding is that no matter how much you nobly refuse to invest in stocks, none of those stocks you're refusing to invest in are going to go to the workers.

[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

And what you don't seem to be understanding is that none of the money you invest or gain from those investments is going towards the revolution, it's just stolen from other working class people

Capital gains are antithetical to Marxism and I'll fight anyone on this

[-] booty@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

it's just stolen from other working class people

True, but I'm not the one who stole it from them and no amount of investing will make it so that I am. It was already stolen, and nothing I have the power to do will return it to its rightful owners. However, any value I can extract from it is a little more in the hands of the working class that it was stolen from and a little less in the hands of the ruling class who stole it. That is the least harmful thing I have the power to do with regard to the value tied up in the stock market.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
141 points (98.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13546 readers
820 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS