192
FTC accuse Microsoft of breaking promise not to raise Game Pass prices after Activision Blizzard deal
(www.rockpapershotgun.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
192 points (99.5% liked)
Gaming
2489 readers
214 users here now
The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community
For news, discussions and memes!
Community Rules
This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:
- No NSFW content
You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.
What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:
- Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
- Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
- Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
- Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
- Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.
If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Oh but they promised! Darn. If only there was some way to regulate corporations.
The FTC sent an angry letter, that will surely stop them.
It was a pinky promise! You can't break a pinky promise!
Ah yes, a pinky promise. An unbreakable legal agreement between nobles.
It's called the Sherman Antitrust Act, and it's why this promise was made and why the FTC cares about it now.
But DO they really care about it? Or is this just to placate the plebs again?
I'll know they care when they actually manage to do something about it.
This FTC is incredibly aggressive. Lina khan is the head, a person who made waves in academia by basically redefining antitrust laws in the digital age, with a specific animus for Amazon. Shes led the FTC teeth forward:
I dunno. I was mostly just trying to explain why the federal government might care about video game pricing at all.
Isn't this exactly what Chevron Deference was about? I don't know how clearly defined the law actually is, but this seems like a prime case for the rubber stamp SCOTUS to jump on and say "actually according to a pig shit farmer from 9500bc the law was meant to mean that monopoly power is awesome."