981
No. (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sxan@midwest.social 27 points 10 months ago

I'm surprised. Merriam-Webster is usually the Urban Dictionary of print dictionaries. I'd have more expected them to change their definition because "muh common usage."

Hacks. OED or death.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

I love that there are strong opinions like this out there for dictionaries.

You've convinced me. I'm ride or die for OED now too.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 10 months ago

I never really thought about choosing a side, but I am a staunch supporter of the Oxford comma. I guess now I know which side I’m on. Let’s fucking go

[-] sxan@midwest.social 9 points 10 months ago

Oh, extra points for the Oxford comma, too. That automatically grants you Pope status.

[-] noseatbelt@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

There's dozens of us!

[-] trevdog@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

the gold standard lexicon

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Hopefully you're an "Oxford comma, ride or die", too.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 10 months ago

Of course! I'd have thought that went without saying. I'm not a barbarian.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I ~~recognize Missouri~~ give up my Oxford comma.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

Oooo! Oooo!

I once worked with a guy from Missouri who said, "you know that little stub that sticks down into Arkansas? If we cut that off and gave it to Arkansas, it'd raise the average IQ of both states by 10 points."

Always thought it was funny, but never knew if he was joking.

[-] Eylrid@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Oxford comma, ride, or die

[-] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

I do like that vampire weekend song.

[-] Stubb@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 10 months ago

I once read an article praising the 1913 edition of the Webster's dictionary and I have been using it ever since (in the form of GNU Collaborative International Dictionary of English). That with etymonline makes the reading experience quite pleasant.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

Webster's still had morals in 1913. I wouldn't shun a 1913 edition.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

Well, you and I were already basically besties, weren't we @The_Picard_Maneuver?

[-] Towwebbed@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Anyone have the definition of OED?

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's the Oxford English Dictionary

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

etymology has nothing to do with common usage.

also common usage is what defines words; that has nothing to do with MW. that's how language works. i can't believe there are still prescriptionists in this century.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
981 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

7059 readers
2365 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS