46
submitted 4 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed the federal government does not have absolute immunity from liability when Parliament enacts laws that are later overturned as unconstitutional.

The ruling says the decision is meant to strike a balance between "the protection of constitutional rights and the need for effective government."

"The government and its representatives are required to exercise their powers in good faith and to respect the 'established and indisputable' laws that define the constitutional rights of individuals," the ruling says.

The ruling stems from the case of Joseph Power, who was convicted on two counts of sexual assault and sentenced to eight months in prison.

When that law was later found to be unconstitutional, Power filed a notice seeking damages from the federal government in court.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld that ruling, freeing Power to pursue damages.


The original article contains 365 words, the summary contains 141 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
315 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS