239
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] citrusface@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Okay, so just a sec, yes, the crowdstrike thing was a BIG fucking deal... But what is wild to me is how it's seemingly being unmentioned that the world crashed bc... Windows crashed.... So maybe it's a wake up call that ONE fucking OS shouldn't be the GLOBAL standard. I dunno tho.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 54 points 4 months ago

It wasn’t the whole world. Our business went on just fine without any issues and we were running Windows too. And the thing about that is you have a lot of people pushing for a homogeneous culture on Linux, not realizing that 1) crowdstrike was crashing Linux systems a couple months ago and 2) if it were to become the dominant system we could see things happen that way too.

So I’m kinda curious, what would you suggest?

[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Trick is that any respectable OS should crash in this scenario. Including when cloudstrike did this to Linux.

There was an uncaught exception in a program that was using a workaround to run unsigned code at a kernel level.

The only part of this on MS is not investigating how Cloudstrike was doing updates. Otherwise its 100% Cloudstrike that set all of this in motion.

[-] citrusface@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That's totally a fair point - thank you for the perspective

[-] Album@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

People are definitely talking about that. Maybe not in the media but in the affected industries.

It was different when we weren't living in a software as a service world. You could be mono platform but since you had complete control you didn't have to worry you could roll out how you wanted.

Crowd strike by it's very nature is supposed to be live updated throughout the day as threats emerge.

If we want services like these maybe we need to come up with better ways to isolate them from the kernel while still allowing crowdstrike type software to detect threats

Solving the crowdstrike problem could solve kernel level anti cheat software too

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You’re talking about the IDS/IPS problem. For it not to impact the kernel it would need to be a passive, read only system. But if you need it to be active to actively prevent threats it needs to have the same level of access a threat actor could gain. You can’t move everything to user space without a shit load of signing and things like TPM and SecureBoot which people have been decrying for years as “vendor lock in”. So at some point a level of trust or risk must be accepted.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

Windows blames the EU for forcing them to allow other vendors with access to do this type of thing rather than just letting Microsoft themselves manage it.

I'm not sure I buy that argument but it's going to get a bit tricky.

[-] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

It’s a bs argument meant to shift blame. I mean does Microsoft really think a major company would leave security up to Windows fucking Defender?

[-] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I dislike windows and I pretty much agree with your point, but this was crowdstrike through and through, wasn’t it? They’re there ones selling a product that requires privileged access, they’re the ones who need to be responsible with that privilege. Microsoft made the OS, but they didn’t do the breaking here.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I simultaneously hear from people that the Internet runs on Linux and also everything in the world runs on windows

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Servers vs desktops.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
239 points (98.8% liked)

News

23435 readers
683 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS