118
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
118 points (95.4% liked)
And Finally...
929 readers
248 users here now
A place for odd or quirky world news stories.
Elsewhere in the Fediverse:
- !weirdnews@real.lemmy.fan
- !offbeat@lemmy.ca
- !nottheonion@lemmy.world
- !nottheonion@lemmy.ml
- !nottheonion@zerobytes.monster
- !aiop@lemmy.world
- !jingszo@lemmy.world
- !forteana@feddit.uk
- !strangetimes@lemmy.world
- !goodnews@feddit.uk
- !upliftingnews@lemmy.world
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other
- The Internet will resurface old "And finally..." material. Just mark it [VINTAGE]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Not as ludicrous as it sounds.
Before I continue, I just want to state that what I'm about to say doesn't excuse what happened. I'm merely trying to give a reason why the ramp may not have been used.
Health and safety regulations specify how steep an access ramp can be. Depending on the height of the stage, this might mean the ramp needs to be very long. Having a ramp around that was/is used for something else doesn't mean it was necessarily suitable for this use case.
I organised events for over decade up until covid, and the ramp requirement was always a question on my checklist for this exact reason. The blame here almost certainly lies entirely at the feet of the organisers, not the poor sods on the front line who were (probably) provided inadequate equipment.
That's my take anyway
Your take is well reasoned and kind, but there is a picture of the stage in the article. It's roughly 2 ft high. There are two very short steps to mount it.
I cant think of a single ramp that would be available as a "ramp" that would not work in this circumstance. A standard 5x5 ft sheet of plywood would have been more than enough to have a very gentle grade to this particular stage.
Haha, true. Guess I should have at least clicked the link!
Simply can't understand why they wouldn't use the ramp they apparently had available then