312
submitted 4 months ago by dogsnest@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Wray said it's not clear yet whether it might have been shrapnel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 73 points 4 months ago

He wasn't really shot, I'm calling it

[-] charles@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago

Some people speculated on this from day 1 when he wasn't posing for photos with his "bullet wound."

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That's because it looks staged. He also has been on WrestleMania a few times and is aware of how to stir up a crowd like that. It's not that much of a stretch to say he had a good idea that the crowd would eat it up.

[-] charles@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Nah, no need for a conspiracy theory. Also NYT photographer got a picture of a flying bullet.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 months ago

Anyone have a chance to look at the teleprompter glass?

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

There's a single hole in one upper corner in a photo.

But my casual impression is that screen was on the far side from the shooter, based on the direction of the sun. But I can't be sure of that without more info.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I was on board with this theory for a minute, but I changed my mind.

If you watch the video of the exact time this occurred, he definitely grabs at something on the side of his face that’s not visible to the camera with his right hand. For a brief moment, you can see that his hand is bloodless.

However, two people died… so that’s the part that can’t really be staged.

If two people hadn’t died, I’d think he crushed one of those Halloween blood capsule things when he went to duck and cover, but the two deaths lead me to believe otherwise.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
312 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19135 readers
1171 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS