312

Wray said it's not clear yet whether it might have been shrapnel

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 177 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

His insecurity-induced attack is pretty much confirmation that the bullet didn't touch him

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 70 points 1 month ago

Easy enough for him to prove it— just take the maxi pad off and show the public.

But now he has a bigger problem, eventually he has to make his lie match his purported ear damage.

[-] PineRune@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

"I got some great plastic surgery, the best plastic surgery. Better than the world has ever seen."

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

#needs more orange 🍊

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago

Just when I thought Trump finally suffers some kind of paltry consequence and he didn't even get shot. Reality sucks.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 12 points 1 month ago

We got thrust into the stupidest timeline. Although the tacos are pretty decent.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

If these are the tacos we get, imagine how awesome the other timeline's tacos must be!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

It's so insecure right? To anyone who is confident or reflective it wouldn't matter.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wouldn't be a big deal if he didn't already have the whole storyline of Jesus personally coming down from the heavens to nudge poor ol' Trump's head out of the way so that we can witness the peace and prosperity of fascist rule under a convicted fraudster

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago

I remember one of the first things I heard was that a bullet struck the teleprompter and he was hit by broken glass. I never heard anything about it after that, so I assumed it was just false; but it made a whole lot of sense at the time.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

wheres the teleprompter now? wouldn't that tell all?

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Dead teleprompters tell no tales.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Hopefully it was taken into evidence immediately, but who knows.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

The teleprompter thing seems to have been debunked but that doesn't mean it was a bullet either.

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 73 points 1 month ago

He wasn't really shot, I'm calling it

[-] charles@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

Some people speculated on this from day 1 when he wasn't posing for photos with his "bullet wound."

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's because it looks staged. He also has been on WrestleMania a few times and is aware of how to stir up a crowd like that. It's not that much of a stretch to say he had a good idea that the crowd would eat it up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

he doesn't want to cooperate= confirmed shrapnel

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

The question was whether a bullet or shrapnel hit Trump. But of course, Trump does not comprehend nuance.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

The question about whether it was a bullet or shrapnel wouldn't even be in the news if Trump didn't insist on playing up being an inch from death. Either answer would have been far less important than being shot at but no, he had to make the question about what hit him a big deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Trump does not comprehend nuance.

I'm dizzy trying to figure out if this is irony, sarcasm, redundant, humour, reality, serious, comical, factual, dystopian...or did the psilocybin just kick in, on so many levels?

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Whoa, it wasn’t meant as some deep, philosophical statement. I just meant that Trump likely doesn’t comprehend Wray’s distinction between getting shot with a bullet and being struck by shrapnel.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Sorry, omitted the "/s".
It was more hyperbolic and melodramatic, though. "/h + /m".

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

/a for apropo

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 1 month ago

Either way, it shouldn't matter, someone still got close to killing him. But of course, Trump probably insists that people say he got hit by a bullet.

I'm sure we'll find out eventually unless he decides to continue wearing his maxi-pad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 month ago

This story could have just gone away, with most people never hearing that maybe he just has a little cut under his big gauze pad and anyone trying to bring it up looking extremely petty. But nope, Trump himself can't just let things pass unanswered.

[-] commandar@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Also worth noting: Wray's statements were made in response to questions asked by Jim Jordan.

This isn't something Democrats went looking to dig up. It got stirred up by one of Trump's frothiest allies.

[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Wait, Santorum isn't in congress though...

[-] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Trying to milk the pity party as long as he can to try and keep the spotlight off of Harris is all.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago

For anyone who was wondering why Trump refused to release the medical report after the shooting, this is why.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 17 points 1 month ago

You're telling me Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies wouldn't release a medical report of him getting "shot"? If he had proof he was shot, It'd be on tshirts made in China and plastered all over the place. It'd be on billboards, flyers in the mail, and everywhere you look.

This is the proof that he didn't get shot, he got hit by shrapnel.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

But he's usually so honest and forthright

[-] charles@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Trump definitely did not fuck a couch.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

Fuck it? I’m more likely to believe that he raped it and then tried to pay it off using campaign funds.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Trump definitely did not fuck a couch.

Citation?

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

He didn't pay hush money to the couch.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago
[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

'Big Sofa' is out to get him and Vance.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Their sexionals are on sale.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I have it on good authority that he also has not denied raping and murdering a young girl in the 1990s.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Ghislaine, that you?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

When you are president, they just let you sit on them.

Even with a full diaper!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Today@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Fingers crossed! I have 'shrapnel' on my election bingo card! I just need "Black Hillary" (thanks for that one @nonailsleft@lemm.ee) and 'JD cries'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

It was a splinter wasn't it?

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago

He got bone spurs in his ears.

[-] rickdg@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Shootings. How do they work. Nobody knows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zoots@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

They followed up that it was likely a bullet or bullet fragment

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe we should ask Putin?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
312 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS