312
His insecurity-induced attack is pretty much confirmation that the bullet didn't touch him
Easy enough for him to prove it— just take the maxi pad off and show the public.
But now he has a bigger problem, eventually he has to make his lie match his purported ear damage.
"I got some great plastic surgery, the best plastic surgery. Better than the world has ever seen."
#needs more orange 🍊
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Just when I thought Trump finally suffers some kind of paltry consequence and he didn't even get shot. Reality sucks.
We got thrust into the stupidest timeline. Although the tacos are pretty decent.
If these are the tacos we get, imagine how awesome the other timeline's tacos must be!
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's so insecure right? To anyone who is confident or reflective it wouldn't matter.
Wouldn't be a big deal if he didn't already have the whole storyline of Jesus personally coming down from the heavens to nudge poor ol' Trump's head out of the way so that we can witness the peace and prosperity of fascist rule under a convicted fraudster
I remember one of the first things I heard was that a bullet struck the teleprompter and he was hit by broken glass. I never heard anything about it after that, so I assumed it was just false; but it made a whole lot of sense at the time.
wheres the teleprompter now? wouldn't that tell all?
Dead teleprompters tell no tales.
Hopefully it was taken into evidence immediately, but who knows.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The teleprompter thing seems to have been debunked but that doesn't mean it was a bullet either.
He wasn't really shot, I'm calling it
Some people speculated on this from day 1 when he wasn't posing for photos with his "bullet wound."
That's because it looks staged. He also has been on WrestleMania a few times and is aware of how to stir up a crowd like that. It's not that much of a stretch to say he had a good idea that the crowd would eat it up.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
he doesn't want to cooperate= confirmed shrapnel
The question was whether a bullet or shrapnel hit Trump. But of course, Trump does not comprehend nuance.
The question about whether it was a bullet or shrapnel wouldn't even be in the news if Trump didn't insist on playing up being an inch from death. Either answer would have been far less important than being shot at but no, he had to make the question about what hit him a big deal.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump does not comprehend nuance.
I'm dizzy trying to figure out if this is irony, sarcasm, redundant, humour, reality, serious, comical, factual, dystopian...or did the psilocybin just kick in, on so many levels?
Whoa, it wasn’t meant as some deep, philosophical statement. I just meant that Trump likely doesn’t comprehend Wray’s distinction between getting shot with a bullet and being struck by shrapnel.
Sorry, omitted the "/s".
It was more hyperbolic and melodramatic, though. "/h + /m".
/ps for psilocybin
/a for apropo
load more comments
(1 replies)
Either way, it shouldn't matter, someone still got close to killing him. But of course, Trump probably insists that people say he got hit by a bullet.
I'm sure we'll find out eventually unless he decides to continue wearing his maxi-pad.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This story could have just gone away, with most people never hearing that maybe he just has a little cut under his big gauze pad and anyone trying to bring it up looking extremely petty. But nope, Trump himself can't just let things pass unanswered.
Also worth noting: Wray's statements were made in response to questions asked by Jim Jordan.
This isn't something Democrats went looking to dig up. It got stirred up by one of Trump's frothiest allies.
Wait, Santorum isn't in congress though...
Trying to milk the pity party as long as he can to try and keep the spotlight off of Harris is all.
For anyone who was wondering why Trump refused to release the medical report after the shooting, this is why.
You're telling me Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies wouldn't release a medical report of him getting "shot"? If he had proof he was shot, It'd be on tshirts made in China and plastered all over the place. It'd be on billboards, flyers in the mail, and everywhere you look.
This is the proof that he didn't get shot, he got hit by shrapnel.
But he's usually so honest and forthright
Trump definitely did not fuck a couch.
Fuck it? I’m more likely to believe that he raped it and then tried to pay it off using campaign funds.
Trump definitely did not fuck a couch.
Citation?
He didn't pay hush money to the couch.
Sofa King obvious.
'Big Sofa' is out to get him and Vance.
Their sexionals are on sale.
I have it on good authority that he also has not denied raping and murdering a young girl in the 1990s.
Ghislaine, that you?
When you are president, they just let you sit on them.
Even with a full diaper!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Fingers crossed! I have 'shrapnel' on my election bingo card! I just need "Black Hillary" (thanks for that one @nonailsleft@lemm.ee) and 'JD cries'.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It was a splinter wasn't it?
He got bone spurs in his ears.
They followed up that it was likely a bullet or bullet fragment
Maybe we should ask Putin?
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
312 points (96.4% liked)
politics
19135 readers
1364 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS