341
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

I'm a member of the queer community and absolutely do not think this is a wise idea for this cycle. Maybe next time around Pete.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I mean this sincerely. Who the fuck cares if he's gay...but.. he's doing an amazing job where he is. He's going after shitty airlines and shitty corporations that are screwing people over. Give him 4 more years dunking on delta please !

[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 months ago

Who the fuck cares if he's gay

A subset of voters that we want to win over

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[-] offspec@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Considering our election system is fundamentally broken and a few thousand voters in a handful of states control our outcome, yes.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Btw, I've noticed nearly every positive dem post on Lemmy today has the top comment being a bot generated negative comment... it's so obvious it's standing out.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I'd be fine with a gay VP. We shouldn't be choosing our candidates based on what bigots want.

Though I'm not sure Pete is it. He has documented animosity from Black voters because of his time as mayor of South Bend during a period of disparate enforcement of cannabis prohibition. Since Harris is trying to distance herself from her time enforcing cannabis prohibition when she was DA, I think appointing Buttigieg runs the risk of reinforcing the "she's a cop" narrative and increasing the likelihood that it will become an effective attack against her.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Pete is 100% but he is not the correct gay candidate. He needs time to grow.

[-] AllTheOther@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 months ago
[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

No, 100 times from this one seems excessive.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
341 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS