243
Kang Rule
(i.imgur.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
243 points (100.0% liked)
196
17534 readers
560 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
His contract said he was the only person who could play Kang in any multiverse.
Really? Disney done fucked that up. Also not enforceable as we know there was a similar contract in a parallel universe for Cuban Holding Jr. and our laws do not rule there....
Damn. If only a comic book franchise could produce a second character who was virtually identical to the first but with a slightly different outfit and mannerism. Shame that's never happened before and nobody would know how to do it.
Doubt
I know it's celebrity news, so might not be true but the story of his special contract clause has been around for a while now.
"During our filming, JM closed the Kang deal. I remember asking said friend about it, and they shared some details. X number of movies, X number of dollars, and more interestingly, due to the nature of the character and potential multiple versions, JM had a contract clause stating that only he could play any and all versions of Kang.”
https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/marvel-forced-keep-jonathan-majors-kang-the-conqueror-leaked-contract-shows
I wonder if another Jonathan majors could fill the role...
Did his contract say anything about getting fired for sexual assault?