Ahhh so we've devolved to "everything could be a simulation were living in." But of a cop out since that's all "what ifs" with no proof, the thing science and reality is based on.

Again you keep mixing up concepts. You are taking a situation where you only know inputs and outputs and the unknown is a black box. We can go and look at a logic gate and look at the circuit and say, yes, it is an AND gate. We can just look at how it's structured and know for sure. Logic gates have physical characteristics that govern how they operate.

By your own logic you could be absolutely wrong about all this but you feel confident enough to keep arguing it. Does that mean you're arguing a point you don't understand or even know is true?