50
Dynamic IP - Self hosting
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
50 points (96.3% liked)
Selfhosted
40134 readers
291 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I own a lot of domains. Why would I want to run my own DNS when I can use a simple uncomplicated system that is time proven and reliable. They could of course set it up with a fisher price interface for thumb suckers who need flash. What feature do you need beyond standard records and a simple dynamic feature? The price isn't that bad either.
You don't run your own DNS, they are services hosted by someone else, just like Afraid. The difference, on top of the interface, is that they support modern record types, they have redundant servers all over the world, there's a team working on them instead of just one guy, they have APIs that can let you manage your many domains easier, they have zone backup and restore etc.
I've used Afraid too, back when I was starting out and didn't know any better, but once I've seen some of the other services out there I've never looked back. You'll never know what extra features you could want if your current service doesn't offer you any.
You don't think you can run your own DNS? Currently I'm using local bind server at work to filter using commercial blocklists. It forwards all windows domain queries to the local AD servers DNS ensuring all internal windows related domains function normally. The external DNS queries though goes through bind and doesn't care about anything except the root servers. I have firewall rules in place that prevent anyone from using any other DNS. Even DNS over TLS traffic is diverted to my DNS or blocked. It doesn't rely on anything or any other organization other than the root servers.
In the twenty something years I've used afraid.org for personal use I've had very little down time. I've tried other services many, many times and other than something like cloudflare there is no point in switching. If you don't want to use it, don't. It works just fine and you can't match the price anywhere else. To give you a sense of how many years I've been doing my own DNS I set my first DNS server for a dial up ISP in 95.
Finally, what record types are you referring to not being supported?
AFAIK it only supports a small subset of all the types currently in use.
I guess I'll worry about the obscure when its needed for something.
CAA and DNSSEC aren't obscure. I would not even consider managing any domain nowadays without them.
Neither are ALIAS/DNAME/HTTPS, which you'll be running into more and more in the future if you haven't already. You could argue there are multiple competing standards at work there but Afraid doesn't implement any of them.
I'll worry about it when it happens until then its obscure and of no importance.
If anything ever happens that involves [the lack of] DNSSEC or CAA you'll have to buy another domain because the old one will be on every block list.
Go away dude. I get that you have hived down the subject to the point of obsession but I've got websites that have been up for decades and if they go on a blocklist it will be for another reason. Not because of two barely used DNS records. Further if they become required then I'm sure they will be supported.