1150
Rule (files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cheddar@programming.dev 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Isn't this because Hubble is actually made to look deep into space and not under its nose? I'm sorry, but I'm not watching a 14 minutes video for that.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I did a two minute internet search and every result says that the Hubble doesn't have the angular resolution for this. It could resolve a football field on the moon, but not anything smaller.

It was made to look at nebulae and galaxies, and those are a lot bigger, even in apparent size.

Focal distance doesn't matter when the aperture is so infinitesimally small compared to the distances. All space telescopes are focused to infinity no matter what they're observing up there.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
1150 points (100.0% liked)

196

17467 readers
1702 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS