329
submitted 1 year ago by idoubtit@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Abbott ‘has the blood of a child on his hands,’ a congresswoman said. ‘No good person would do this,’ said Mexico President López Obrador.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org -4 points 1 year ago

He didn't say anything factually wrong. Neither did you in the first sentence, but then you went for a personal attack for no reason.

People claim Lemmy is better because downvotes mean nothing, but that also encourages this shitty behavior.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Someone implying a person should die without trial for violating border laws in peacetime is what encourages this kind of behavior.

No one is owed civility.

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Correct, but please mind rule 1. We don’t owe you access to commenting in this community.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

The irony of this comment in response to me calling someone a monster for implying a child deserved to die in a trap because they were in violation of civil tort is not lost on me.

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The proper way to deal with someone you dissagree with is, downvote, respond without a personal attack (doesn’t help your point in any way) and block if you really hate them.

This has nothing to do with the content in the discussion. We want this place to be a forum for discussion where everyone is treated with respect, this doesn’t work if we let people who we agree with do whatever they want.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Heard that. Imma bow out of this thread.

I wish you a fruitful future of civil disagreement with people who think it appropriate that violators of civil tort be murdered without trial.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No one is owed civility.

Why the fuck not?

Not replying is always an option.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

That’s a very valid point, everyone could just not reply to monstrous statements.

I wonder what would happen if people who either want to get a rush from transgression or genuinely hold hideous views were never chastised?

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 year ago

Imagine if the judge reading a list of charges on you followed up each one with "you dumb fuck".

What you're saying makes no sense.

All I said is keep personal insults to yourself. You know nothing about the people you communicate with on Lemmy. You have zero insight into their life, their experiences, their education or anything that would give you the right to insult them personally.

Just state your opinion and stfu. Full stop. If you're unable to keep personal insults to yourself, don't comment. It's very simple.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Judges do that kind of thing all the time. They literally comment on the proceedings and people in the vernacular in addition to using their position of power to influence the outcome.

I know enough about the people writing stuff on the internet to break the usual social rules of decorum: some of them say vile, reprehensible, hateful, inhuman drivel and that is enough to insult them.

What are you really saying here? Are you truly suggesting that when someone implies “hey, this little kids tragic death is acceptable because they were in violation of a law” it’s wrong to tell them that they’re a monster?

[-] Misconduct@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Waaaa don't respond to me I don't like discussion I just want to defend people that applaud the death of a child in peace! Also, despite the fact that we're discussing child murder, please everyone understand that being mean on the Internet is worse."

[-] Misconduct@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How is the literal child a criminal when they had zero say in anything that happened to them? What's wrong with you people? Honestly? A child died needlessly, someone calls them a criminal and says they deserved it, and your entire contribution is to tell people not to be mean to the guy calling a dead kid a criminal and saying they deserved to be punished? How did you get so utterly disconnected from any form of empathy or even just rationality?

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you have some sort of mental processing issue which precludes your ability to understand what context is, you're excused somewhat.

This was someone's kid, just like you. If nobody points out how horrible these sentiments are, where will we end up? "They were a criminal" isn't relevant to what sounds like an excuse for justifying their death.

I edited this to be less vitriolic, I originally asked you to choke on a book, but let's try the civil route.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

You just can't make a comment without personal attack, can you?

Please give me context in which judge hands out sentence for even the most vicious of crimes and follows it up with personal attacks.

I understand online forum isn't a court room, but there's zero reason for insults in either case.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure I can. See?

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
329 points (95.1% liked)

News

23259 readers
1596 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS