I disagree that you can feel the intent in the painting of a 6yo more than you can feel the intent behind the prompt in an AI generated image. The person making the prompt has intent.

If the intent of a painting was evident, then there wouldn't be so much backlash against abstract art, and debate about what art means.

All I was trying to say is that "AI assistance" has become a sliding scale all the way from simple tools like intelligent select tools, to complete image generation, and all kinds of points in between (eg: smart-erase, uncrop, in painting to add entirely new things) so it's difficult to draw a clear line between what is and what isn't "AI art"