126
submitted 3 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago

That's like saying oh yeah my friend is a serial killer, but at least he doesn't beat his family. Besides, I will tell him how upset I am about all the murdering he's doing next time we go out for beers.

[-] protonbeam@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

No offense, but that’s really goddamn stupid. Do you understand that voting is an exercise in constrained optimization.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago

The only thing that's really goddamn stupid is pretending that voting for genocide is somehow moral. No better illustration of the fact that liberals are utterly morally bankrupt.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

We have a choice between one person publicly calling for a ceasefire and another who says Israel needs to finish the job.

I'm not sure what you want us to do here.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Are you easily fooled by someone saying one thing while doing the opposite? don't you not care whether their actions align with their words or not?

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago
[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I’m going to either vote for Jill Stein or Claudia De la Cruz. Both are appealing for different reasons.

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I want real options. Neither will have a positive affect in the election. If I vote for either of them, that's basically helping Trump. Who supports genocide. I'd rather support the people that say genocide is bad.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

The Democrats deny that there is a genocide. They are engaging in it, not saying it is bad.

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

You're Right, I'll correct myself and say that at least Democrats aren't denying Israel is killing too many. So which do you prefer in office, Trump or Harris? Only either of them will win, so saying neither is the same as disengaging with politics.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

If those are the only options, I'd rather disengage from politics.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago
[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

Lol ok sure bud, Trump moving the embassy to Israel, and wanting Israel to hurry up with their genocide is the same as Kamala criticizing Israel.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Stop supporting genocide. Stop pretending you don't hear that.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I could attend every Free Palestine protest, boycott every Israel-affiliated company, volunteer at human-rights organizations, raise money for Palestinian relief, write a book about the genocide of the Palestinian people at the hands of Israel, and cast a vote for Harris rather than Trump, and you would still say I support genocide.

While doing what you would probably rather me do, all those things except not cast a vote at all, would be actively helping the opposition, who not only wants Israel to "finish the job," but also moved the American embassy to Jerusalem, officially recognized Israeli settlements one the West Bank as legal, and has said he wants to deport communists and Free Palestine protesters.

So at the end of the day, yeah I'm gonna vote for Harris. Am I happy with the Democratic party? Of fucking course not, but I don't really have a choice in the matter.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I could attend every Free Palestine protest, boycott every Israel-affiliated company, volunteer at human-rights organizations, raise money for Palestinian relief, write a book about the genocide of the Palestinian people at the hands of Israel, and cast a vote for Harris rather than Trump, and you would still say I support genocide.

Any list that contains X contains X. You're giving material support to a political faction that's carrying out genocide. The political analogy isn't voting for Hindenburg, it's reelecting Hitler in 1944.

What I want you to do is recognize that there are no solutions within the existing political order and that is not an excuse.

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Kamala did NOT call for a cease fire. She said for 3 weeks directly after it.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Their "ceasefire" is a lie. They just want a pause.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I want Kamala to call for an arms embargo on Israel if they refuse to negotiate a ceasefire.

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

They want us to magically fix all the problems overnight, while blaming us for everything in the meantime.

[-] lol_idk@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 months ago

What lol? What a psychotic take

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

The psychotic take is saying, sure the party I'm going to vote for is committing crimes against humanity, but at least they're might be less repressive at home.

[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 months ago

Oh you don't feel superior enough yet? Maybe you should be even more reductive. I think your throne might be too far up to see that us peons actually have to do something instead of just cry on the internet and then feel smug about it.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

How dare you shame me for ignoring a genocide!

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
126 points (71.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7203 readers
280 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS