33
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/offbeat@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

okay so the first one has a paywall, the second one says that she fought for feminist ideals but doesn't cite any examples, the third is literally a single paragraph description of a documentary. the fourth and fifth keep talking about how her personal letters show she was a leftist. the only thing I found her being active in was nuclear policy.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

So you can recognize she has a reputation for being a feminist

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

which part of my summary gave you that idea? I'm not being sarcastic, I'd like you to be specific

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

The part where you read through many different sources that viewed her as feminist

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

so not only did you not read the sources, you didn't read my summary. get fucked bro

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s an argument on reputation

I am not sure if it’s because English isn’t your first language or what reason you aren’t able to understand that an idea being widespread proves a reputation exists more than the merits of it

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

Offbeat

1283 readers
29 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS