591
submitted 3 months ago by gytrash@feddit.uk to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

"Signal is being blocked in Venezuela and Russia. The app is a popular choice for encrypted messaging and people trying to avoid government censorship, and the blocks appear to be part of a crackdown on internal dissent in both countries..."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

Yeah. Telegram, should be next, there's a huge risk with it too. And email! Social networks too, just in case. And postal mail, we can't forget that. We should crack down any form of uncensored communication.

All for the benefit of the people, of course. \s

[-] Novman@feddit.it 19 points 3 months ago

In UK don't ban them, but jail you if they don't like your posts, more democratic.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 3 months ago

While I don't live in the UK I do believe they have protections on free speech.

If you are concerned you can always hide your identity.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 7 points 3 months ago

I'm not living in uk, i live in italy. I saw every kind of comment written on italian social networks and i have never seen a conviction. When the police had taken the names of protesters, ( not arrested ) we had a public outcry. We had arrest for direct call for violence, not simply rants. So seeing people jailed for rants on twitter scares me. We have actual fascists and communists, both parties were strong, and we had an actual civil war. We have strong linguistic minorities and regional parties. So a lot of people hating each other. Who decide the right speech in such a situation?

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

Are people really jailed for rants in the UK? I've only seen stories of actual call to violence.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

The line between rants and call for violence is quite blurred in some cases IMHO

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

Can you give an exemple of such case in the recent events in the UK?

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

false informations , even worst, newspapers publish false information ( rumors ) every day

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So she has been arrested, not jailed. We don't know much about this specific case yet but this has nothing to do with a rant, like you said.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

Ok, not a rant, a fake news...

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

A fake news meant to stir up racial hatred.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Lol, so ban every news... We have politicians telling worst thing that a simple fake news and no one riot. Maybe a thousand of rapes in one city could cause it. Here ONE rape is a news with the name and the nationality of the criminal. Why the people that havr covered that are not in jail?

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

She has not been jailed and we don't know what she posted.

Obviously there is no ground to ban every news but I agree something should be done about politicians and media spurring hate.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

About spreading hate? Like one thousand rapes in one city, like everyone have one friend/relative victim of it and the problem is spreading hate? I hope you are jocking. ( i'm talking about rotherham )

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

I did not know about Rotherham, what's the link between the two?

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

The assault of the refugee hotel was in rotherham, and the riots were mostly in the north of england, in labour areas where the phenomenon of the asian grooming gang were most prevalent. I remember rotherham cause it was the most in(famous) case and also one of the places of the worst riots.

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

But what's the link with the arrested woman?

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It is a link that the reasons of the riots were far more deep that a single tweet. The world is a little bit more complicated that button-> action.

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

But no one is saying that a single tweet started all this.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No one? The narrative is : fake news and tweets started all this. We need to regulate the internet. As the french revolution was started by the statements of Marie-Antoinette.

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

You are right that there are underlying causes that needs to be addressed. That's why it spread so much and so fast. But that doesn't make racially motivated fake news OK.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

I have some bad news for you. There is no right answer

[-] Novman@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

And normaly it is very difficult to be comdemned for a generic rant. It is easier in case of insults or defamtion, but it is mostly an high fee. Jailing a political adversary for a speech ( when we had a lot of political/mafia killing in the past ) is a big no. We had actual people killed for their speech.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 3 months ago

That movie director that got killed 50 years ago is a wild story.

[-] Novman@feddit.it 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, i think you talk about Peppino Impastato , he was killed cause he joked about mafia.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
591 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

31995 readers
1135 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS