9
Asians are less ‘humane’ – Ukrainian security chief
(www.elrisala.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
9 points (57.9% liked)
World News
32306 readers
462 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Am I drunk or is there literally just one (1) git arguing that "it's totally not what it seems"? I guess the other downvooters don't have anything to say. Truth hurts, I suppose.
Not drunk. You're right that I'm th only one in here saying maybe you should actually look into the bit rather than dog piling onto some propaganda.
You must feel quite heroic
Probably about as much as you did typing that out.
Oh hey, you're still here. Quickest keyboard in the west
Oh hey- so are you.
I mean it would look better for you if you were drunk. The fact that you make these comments sober makes it all the more hilarious.
Ok yog. As per usual you don't have anything except some ad hominum bs. Anyone can see you history I don't have to prove anything- you've done it to yourself already
At least learn what ad hominem is if you're going to use it to try and sound smart. What people should be looking at is your post history. Now that's what an actual propagandist shill looks like.
Lol. Oh really?
ad ho·mi·nem
adjective
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
prop·a·gan·dist Noun
a person who promotes or publicizes a particular organization or cause.
Which organization or cause am I promoting again? Meanwhile yours is full of anti west bullshit with terrible sources, easily disproven clickbait, and you constantly insulting anyone who dares take the 30 seconds it takes to dismantle your delusional ranting.
Ad hominem would be me saying you're wrong because of your personal qualities. I'm saying you're wrong and you're deplorable not that you're wrong because you're deplorable. Ad hominem is actually what you're doing. You're trying to discredit my posts by making personal attacks on me, but you never engage with the actual content of my posts. Seems like you've taken the whole day here to make a clown of yourself, but failed to take the 30 seconds to address anything I said. Bye troll.
Oh yeah? I've already pointed out your posting of disinformation in previous comments. Your response? Blocking me because you knew I was right. Literally half the time you post something the second page of your own source completely discredits your original point. You post clickbait and don't even bother to read it yourself clown.
I literally gave you the definition of ad hominem and you still fucked it up. You attack character- not position. You have made 0 counters to any arguments I've made. Purely attacking me personally. That's literally the definition of ad hominem. And you literally havent made any attempt at a point in this discussion- so literally nothing to counter. So yeah- goodbye indeed troll. Again.
Literally all you've done was make personal attacks on me, and never actually made a single point of your own. You don't know what ad hominem is, you didn't have a position to attack dumb ass. People being mean to you isn't ad hominem. What attempt can there be at a discussion with a troll who screeches about propagandists when presented with facts. You're a sad clown and you just provide free entertainment for the rest of us. That's your lot in life.
Buddy you have issues. Literally I've pointed out that it's easy to see whatvyouvare about by looking at your profile. That's it. Oh also calling you a propagandist... which you are by definition. And again- I literally GAVE YOU THE DEFINITION of ad hominem. Which you don't like so now you claim I'm the one who doesn't know what it is. Lol. Literally brain dead.
My position is that people should actually do a bit of research into something before just jumping onto obvious propaganda. I've stated that explicitly and implicitly throughout this entire time here. That you can't figure it out is really a you problem. That you now admit you don't have a position- when you previously accused me of not addressing any of he points you made just shows you have no idea what's going on. I'd guess you are the drunk one here.
Please point to the facts you are referring to- I'd love to discuss any that I failed to address earlier
If that's entertainment for you- well good. Because you have definitely entertained me here. Lol. This is why i say you are so bad at what you do- you say a thing (you dont know what ad hominim is)- someone provides a fact/source/rebuttal (the definition of ad hominem)- and you make personal attacks because you dont like it took 30 seconds to disnantle your argument. So sad mate.