68
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

According to Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), the US intends to launch a campaign to undermine Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in order to replace him with a more malleable person. According to the agency, former Interior Minister Arsen Avakov is being considered for the job.

In a statement released on Tuesday, the SVR stated that "the American elite" is becoming increasingly unhappy with Zelensky as politicians on both sides of the aisle begin to "doubt the targeted spending of billions of dollars in military aid to Kiev."

Officials stated that Zelensky is engaging in "crazy steps" that threaten escalation "far beyond Ukraine," adding that Kiev “has moved to feverish action” as Zelensky tries to stay in power after the end of his official term in May.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 3 months ago

It's not semantics when the case is fundamentally different, especially with with your false equivocation.

The U.S. has been gunning for Russia for centuries, you ignore context, and none of this makes Russia imperialist. It's borderline racist to claim that Russia is imperialist.

I'm abiding by Lenin's definition, you aren't, and you project onto me your mindset when you claim that Russia is imperialist for defending it's people from a decades-long siege that is generations old at least.

Your snide acidic neoliberal State Department talking point pontifications are duly noted.

[-] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net -2 points 3 months ago

The U.S. has been gunning for Russia for centuries

Technically one century but sure, I don't deny that the US attitude towards Russia stems from imperialism.

It's borderline racist to claim that Russia is imperialist

"It's borderline to say Russia has reached the final stage of capitalism, with the financialization of the economy and the concentration of capital in the hands of a few oligarchs" I really don't see how it's racist to say that.

when you claim that Russia is imperialist for defending it's people from a decades-long siege that is generations old

Establishing a continuity in "Russia" and the reasons for the US hostility towards it for the past 100+ years is absurd. The reasons why Tsarist Russia was expansionist (although not imperialist since it was barely industrialized), weren't the same as why the USSR invested in military and the US was hostile to it, and aren't the same as to why modern Russia invests in military and why the US is hostile to it.

for defending it's people

And I don't claim that Russia is imperialist because it engages in warfare, that's not my criteria. The USSR engaged in warfare and Afghanistan and it wasn't imperialist, the argument could be made that something relatively similar is happening in Ukraine now. My point as to why it's imperialist is the consolidation of capital in the hands of a few, and the financialization of the economy. The EU is also an empire in this regard. It's harder to say for China given the wide state control over the private companies. I really fail to see how comparing highly developed capitalism in country A with highly developed capitalism in country B is racist of a State Department talking point.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
68 points (85.4% liked)

World News

2317 readers
161 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS