247
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Me? I thought the class was dumb because it was super obvious. But I'm inherently skeptical, and I do think its important to have for most people who don't think critically.

I can't remember the details, but I suspect it was things like who wrote it? Are the claims cited? Who are they citing? Is it peer reviewed? What is the author trying to convey? What type of language is being used? Who is the target audience? Etc

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

Still better than nothing. Although most of those seem to be training people that "who said it" is how truthfulness of a statement should be judged which is exactly backwards.

[-] Chiro@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

The value of “who said it” is to help you recognize their motivation. Anyone trying to convince you of something has a vested interest in their position. Understanding the speaker is critical in understanding their position.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

The point is to understand the concept of credibility. Who said it matters. Some people have a demonstrated history if credibility. Some people have a demonstrated history of incredibly.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
247 points (95.6% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
380 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS