79
submitted 2 months ago by Mothra@mander.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Seen this in many houses, people upgrade their lighting setup and install a dimmer. Which works. But usually it also makes the lights flicker unintentionally, which is super annoying IMO.

Now, my understanding of electrical engineering is pretty rudimentary so I'd appreciate more something that explains the concept in a way that Cavewoman Mothra can understand rather than something technically accurate.

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

LED lights are either all on or all off, the only way to dim a LED, is to make it blink really fast and change the time it’s on vs the time it’s off. Cheap LED lights don’t blink fast enough, so you see them flicker.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

That's not the only way to dim an LED, just the cheapest. Variable current power regulators are the premium option.

A screw-in LED bulb combines LEDs and power regulating electronics. Some of them handle the variable input voltage a household dimmer provides gracefully, but that's more expensive.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Changing the current can change the hue (color) of the led. In some cases it’s okay in some cases it isn’t. Cinema lights for instance don’t dim with voltage because of that. Instead they have 3 separate drivers synchronized to dim in a canon. One after the other so that there is always the same number of LEDs on at all time regardless of the dimmer level.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hi Lazaro!

That’s not always true, actually. For example, Digital Sputnik lights (and some LED tape that I have that I use my current control dimmers on) utilize current control dimming. This alternative type of dimming allows them to work even with super high speed frame-rates due to having very little or even no perceivable flicker. It’s certainly unpopular in comparison to PWM but definitely not unheard of in the film industry.


I used to use the technique you mention with >2K tungsten lights for footage above 1000 fps. I figured out (in the absence of a budget that could afford a DC rectifier) that if I ran the same amount of lights on each of the legs of a 3 phase Delta style Gennie that they would effectively fill in each others’ pulses. I further enhanced that effect by shining all 6 5K’s (for example) on the same rag.

I used that technique here: https://youtu.be/w9-NoEnWSgk

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That’s awesome! I love how deep we are going with this! I have to admit I don’t k or as much about cinema lighting as I know about cameras and Steadicam.

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago

I’m happy to share any experiences I have had as we’re likely the only two filmmakers in the whole fediverse right now!

:)

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That's true. Describing current regulation as the premium option was an oversimplification. For household lighting, it's usually the premium option.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
79 points (98.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43822 readers
876 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS