756
submitted 3 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Musk’s repeated outbursts against advertisers have dried up the main source of revenue for the loss-making company formerly known as Twitter. A recent decision to sue them for heeding his own advice to not buy ads on the platform hasn’t helped. At some point, he will have to provide a fresh infusion of cash to salvage his $44 billion takeover.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] auzy@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

The problem with Tesla really is Elon.

If he sells his majority stake, I suspect it would be a lot better.

The biggest reason against buying them is him. They also make more than cars (their powerwalls seem alright).

If X fails though, I suspect all those bigots will flood over to here (Facebook and X seem to be distracting them for now).

Let them have their nazi prison. Just make it not profitable

[-] A7thStone@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Personally I'd be wary of putting a giant brick of lithium in my house, especially from a company with the questionable quality control of Tesla.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I agree partially, but in practice, the LFP batteries should be fine (I would never trust the PowerWall 2).

Unfortunately, been looking at other alternatives, and there don't seem to be many seamless home batteries that cut in instantly in the event of a power outage (like an online UPS) either.

The reality is though, I expect Tesla to lose this market anyway (they only just introduced the PowerWall 3 in AU.. Even cheap chinese manufacturers have been using LFP for a while)

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

The people who aren't buying Teslas because they hate Musk aren't gonna change their mind because he sold some stock. The company is tainted forever.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

They won't a tiny amount.. But controlling share they might.

I can't afford a Tesla. However, my biggest concern is that musk will half arse firmware or sabotage the company somehow.

If he doesn't have controlling share, that's a win and I suspect quality control will likely improve too

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The company is tainted forever.

...he didn't found the company, engineer the cars, systems, nor infrastructure: there's a lot of salvageable value in tesla if he goes away...

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The only real engineering he's done is likely the boring company (who the duck wants to drive in a claustrophobic one lane tunnel) and the submarine thing the cave divers said wouldn't work (so he called them pedos)

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

He didn’t engineer anything because he doesn’t know how. At most he drew some kindergarten levels drawings on a white board.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The reality is.. He is an engineer. Not all engineers have good ideas.

The difference is, he won't accept criticism

I do software development and have had a few crap ideas (I once thought I could make a optimised OpenGL library using Matricies). The difference between normal people and him, is that when I got told it was a crap idea, I deleted the project. When he gets a crap idea, he attacks the person giving feedback, so there is NO incentive to provide anything but good feedback

When you're surrounded by yes men you'll only increasingly become over confident in yourself

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, Elon isn’t an engineer. He doesn’t have an engineering degree from an ABET certified school, no FE or PE license, nor does he understand basic engineering or design principles.

You can lick his boots and lie all you want, but Elon is a rich bitch trust fund baby who takes credit for the ideas of others and you defend him. It’s honestly sad, coming from a mechanical engineer, that you as someone who works in software development, would call him an engineer.

[-] LowleeKun@feddit.org 2 points 3 months ago

I mean i am too poor and don't need a car but i could see myself buying a tesla once elon really is gone and the other two factors change for me.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

Not forever. Just as long as he has a share of it.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Having worked with Tesla I can tell you not all their problems would leave with Elon, but it would certainly be a great start.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

From my understanding he overworks people. Is that correct?

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

If he sells it all, I'll buy a Tesla the next day. Until then, dinosaur bones for me. Unless an economical and very powerful aftermarket swap parts become readily available.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

I wouldn’t. The board is filled with Elon sycophants. Tesla manufacturing remains subpar.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
756 points (96.8% liked)

News

23397 readers
1827 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS