945
submitted 2 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 months ago

Lay off Vance, everyone! The risk of actually showing how stupid and robotic this guy is is that he might get replaced on the VP candidate slot. He's a terrible choice that's driving people away, but if he gets replaced literally a bowl of soup would be a better choice.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago

Nah I think a replacement does worse. Not because the replacement would be worse, but it shows insane weakness/ stupidity/ inability to have a coherent strategy on the part of a Trump campaign. It shows that these guys don't know what it takes to win an election; and giving your vote to a team that doesn't know how to win an election is a wasted vote. Its the same as why Biden was struggling; losing charges compound interest because viability is a key component of whether or not people vote for you. If you aren't perceived as viable because of your polling, it bites double.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 months ago

This is my feeling as well. For Trump to replace Vance means Trump admitting he made a bad call. He makes horrible calls constantly, but I don't see him admitting to a single one.

[-] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

He wouldn’t admit it. He would find something to blame on Vance (probably wouldn’t be a strain) and then “You’re Fired!” and the red hats would chuckle and never miss a beat.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wonder if Vance then makes the talk show circuit and turns anti-Trump while hyping his new tell-all book

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That would be funny as hell, and well frankly probably exactly what would happen.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It also kinda nukes all their bitching about replacing Biden.

Biden was never officially nominated. Vance was. It's a much bigger deal that shows weakness in the party.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Bruh, he fired like 129% of his cabinet and other higher-ups last time.

[-] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

...so you're suggesting some kind of "replacement theory".... Go on....those dumb dumbs would hate if the meaning of that phrase got flipped. lol

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 11 points 2 months ago

But what if we get the Mooch? How can you deny us the possibility of the Mooch?

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I had not considered the Mooch. That's a great point.

How long as Vance been on the ticket in Mooches?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Yes, but RFK may or may not be. And at this point trump might put the wrong RFK on his ticket and get the brain worm guy instead of the dead politician.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The more I think about it, the more I expect RFK will replace him.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Hasn’t the filing deadline in most states already passed?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You get into the role of electors, who are supposed to submit the votes for who best represents the state's choice or something like that. This was written back when it would take weeks to get to DC, so who knows what would be there.

[-] AGreenPurple@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago

What I don't get as an outsider - this guy (like other equally weird persons as for example Mrs. Palin) is in a rather high political position.

How in the world are these people elected? Is it only about being in the preferred party or were their opponents even more incompetent?

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Combination of Peter Thiel’s money and Trumps endorsement.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
945 points (96.6% liked)

News

23259 readers
3519 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS