72
submitted 1 month ago by NotSteve_@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tleb@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 month ago

Singh had many reasonable opportunities to do this over the last few years, but finally pulls the rip cord when the Conservatives are polling way ahead? What the fuck? He's such a useless piece of shit, why do the NDP keep him around

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

It's because of the rail labour dispute. The NDP can't/won't be party to cutting down unions.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

Doing it when the Liberals are in really bad shape improves the odds of the NDP winning, up from 0.0 to 0+ε.

[-] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I thought selecting him for leader was bad years ago, but it's obvious now that he can't really do much of anything. Guess we'd better prep for 4 years of conservative austerity since our electoral system is broken.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

We will be lucky to get away with 4 years. A generation of young men is being swayed conservative in the smoke pits of the internet and I'm worried we'll suffer a lost decade of governance by bumper sticker weirdos.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

It kinda looks like PP goaded him into it with the timing.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

I think it's less of "goaded him into it" and more of "predicted it". As others have pointed out, messing with unions is a red-line for the NDP.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Jagmeet is decent. Its the voters who are complete shit.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

To paraphrase Terry Pratchett, once you think the problem is that you have the wrong kind of people, you shouldn't be a leader

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

And how does that apply to me?

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

You'd said the problem was voters. That's an entirely wrong way to look at politics.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Obviously I was being glib. But even if I weren't, I am not intending to be a leader, so Pratchet is not talking about me.

Having said that, voters have dynamic, even mutable qualities, and those are exactly the qualities that determine elections. There is an entirely reasonable approach to politics that is about educating and informing voters so that they can make more rational decisions. There is a very effective approach to politics that encourages and exploits voter disenfranchisement. Yes, voters can be the problem.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
72 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7161 readers
315 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS