597
submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yesoutwater@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

What is complicated? You give two bullet points and a potential solution that all fall under the umbrella of "paying someone." This solves the problem.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's a simple solution to what's a more nuanced problem.

Be honest. If faced with the choice to cut hours/roles, move roles overseas, or to "pay more", do you think many business owners will do the latter?

You need to consider the nuance here, otherwise you find a similar situation to the minimum wage rises, where businesses complain about the operations not being viable because they need to start treating workers like humans.

[-] yesoutwater@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yes, I agree. We definitely need to consider the "nuance" of a situation where business is asked to treat their workers like human beings.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You can be as obtuse as you want. You know I'm right, and it's exactly why legislation is needed to ensure these things are done correctly to stop businesses from exploiting the rules.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
597 points (97.9% liked)

Antiwork

8295 readers
87 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS