642
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah send them this and then post what they say. I’d be interested.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 month ago

I already know since it was hammered home each class for the entire course.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What is the problem, for the nurse, then?

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Wait - this nurse is an anti-vaxxer? Or this is some other thing?

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

That's not the issue. You can not in any way state or imply anyone that could possibly be identified in any way has even been through your health facility's doors, unless compelled by a court order, with some mandated reporter exceptions. This would be suspected child abuse, or someone may be a danger to self or others. CMS and OIG/federal register websites go in depth, on technicalities. The article doesn't say who the nurse was, but yes, she or he didn't even put a name. The issue is consent, and even that doesn't matter with employers. That nurse jeopardized the whole practice being shut down and/or sued.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
642 points (97.3% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2608 readers
162 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS