616
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

GOP lawmakers and analysts virtually unanimous that Trump was second best to Harris in first presidential debate

Donald Trump’s campaign was in damage control mode on Wednesday amid widespread dismay among supporters over a presidential debate performance that saw Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent, repeatedly goad him into going wildly off-message and missing apparent opportunities to tackle her on policy.

Even with Trump insisting to have won the debate “by a lot”, Republicans were virtually unanimous that Trump had come off second best in a series of exchanges that saw the vice-president deliberately bait him on his weak points while he responded with visible anger.

The Republican nominee – who took the unusual step afterwards of visiting the media spin room, a venue normally frequented only by candidates’ surrogates – was non-committal on Wednesday to the Harris campaign’s proposal for a second debate. Despite widespread opinion to the contrary, Trump suggested she needed it because she had lost. “I’d be less inclined to because we had a great night. We won the debate,” he told Fox & Friends.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Trump claimed immigrants were eating people's pets. And doubled down when called on it. How low is your bar?

[-] webadict@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Remember when claiming immigrants were stealing and eating pets was enough to disqualify someone from being a president?

... No?

Ah, my bad, this insane new low seems to have never happened before.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

Rewatch the debate. She rarely actually answered a question. deflected most of the time. I ding a candidate each time they do that.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

How often did Trump actually answer a question versus deflection?
Okay, so let's ding them both equally for deflection and now let's focus on how they deflected: Did Kamala say anything nearly as batshit crazy as "schools are forcing surgery on children"?

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

Let's put this on a scale of 1-10

10 is top

Trump was batshit crazy and lied so he gets a 1

Harris just plain deflected on a ton of stuff, so I ding her to a 2. She had ample opportunity to answer and just plain didn't. So instead of being bat shit crazy, she either wasn't prepared or wasn't able to think on her feet. Either way I give her a two for lack of answers.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So Harris was twice as good as Trump?

Again I have to ask how low your bar is. If neither answered questions, but Trump insisted on deranged delusions (he doubled down on the claim that immigrants are eating pets when challenged) how do you consider that only slightly worse than someone who didn't answer questions but lives in reality?

When Biden had a bad debate Democrats were willing to admit he had a bad debate. It was presented as "we still have to vote for him because Trump wants to be a dictator, but ya, that wasn't good."
Trump makes up absolute nonsense and people try to insist that "it was close."

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Umm if you go from 1 to 2 then that sounds like it’s doubled. But if you go from 1 to 2 on a ten point scale then exactly how is that doubled? By that logic going from 2 to 3 is also doubled. Yeah no.

[-] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

No....no. See, 1+1=2, so we can see that 2 is double the amount of 1. 2+2=4.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Of course, the only thing you reply to is the random joke and not the actual points being made. I can only assume that means you consider the rest of my post reasonable and agree with it.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So because I didn’t say no the answer must be yes?

Talk about a dumb take

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Because you don't say anything relevant you must not have anything relevant to say.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

At this point with as many ways as questions have been answered and you still don't get it. I am going to classify you as a troll and just move on. Good luck out there

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

"you keep trying to get me to defend my point, which I cannot do. So I'm going to call you a troll and run away."

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
616 points (98.4% liked)

News

23409 readers
2051 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS