111
Pyongyang at night
(hexbear.net)
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
So what’s with the pictures? Are there just less people? Or less light pollution for some reason?
Iirc it has to do with being unable capture satellite images or something
What I heard is that the pic has been edited to make the north look darker.
Nearly every photo showing the DPRK as having no lights at night is fake to some degree.
Now it is important to know that the North and Eastern parts of the DPRK are very mountainous so you are only going to see light on the Western/North West Coastal side mostly. That's because that's where all the people are.
But generally the pictures shown are from when there are blackouts, which still happen being a country under embargo, but it's not all the time. Secondly they are usually composites, so they've combined multiple blackouts to make it look like there's no lights. It like if you overlapped a whole lot of satellite photos post hurricanes and storms in the USA to suggest the USA was worse off in those regions.
Also photoshop and other exaggeration measures.
My main guess is they have less street lights. The vast majority of that light has to be street lighting and it's just not prioritised by central planning perhaps?
Obviously the infrastructure exists for electricity if they have these other things. So a light difference must come from other factors. I'm working on the assumption these differences aren't caused by a problem with composite images too, I do not know if there is an issue occurring there or not.
basically the military took fewer pictures and worse pictures.
-- Earth at Night