250
submitted 2 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

My God what hubris. Rush had so many chances to pause the dive or work on a redesign and ignored it. I can't imagine the fear of being 3000+ feet below and hearing the first cracks of the hull as it starts to implode. Hope it was fast.

[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I don't think there were any cracks. Most probably it was, one second there is a submersible and everything seems fine, and the next second there is no submersible. And everything is still fine because we just got rid of a few billionaires for free, and didn't even have to use a guillotine.

[-] noride@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That theory doesn't explain why they suddenly dropped ballast and attempted an ascension prior to implosion, though.

E. After doing some digging, the comments about the Titan having dropped weights and was ascending during implosion came from James Cameron. Not sure if that makes it more or less trustworthy...

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The linked article quotes somebody as saying the dropped weights were most likely to slow the descent as they approached the ocean floor. They just dropped a little weight, but not enough to start ascending again.

[-] noride@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I think that's a fair assessment, mine isn't all that dissimilar.

My understanding is there were only a few meters between the weight drop and complete communication loss, so either something went wrong directly related to dropping ballast, which caused the implosion, or perhaps cues the sub was in peril were ignored/misinterpreted by the captain, and the weight drop was his ineffective corrective measure.

From what I've read about the captian, I think his hubris would have never allowed him to fully consider they might be in real danger.

[-] icedterminal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Something could have gone wrong electronically or mechanically warranting a ballast drop. I have considered this to be a possibility outside of them hearing cracks and suddenly wanting to go up.

[-] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I agree that we're talking milliseconds between the first crack and full implosion. Any cracks in carbon fiber will act as a stress concentrator which will cause more cracking in a rapid exponential process. There's a reason everyone else doing this said you can't use that material. Metal has some ductility so a very tiny crack normally won't cascade like that instantly.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I hope so too. Especially for the kid that was brought along. But even if it was a second or two... knowing you're about to die and there's nothing you can do to stop it...

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

At approximately 2,274 meters, the Titan sent the message, "All good here," according to the animation.

The last communication from the submersible was sent at approximately 3,341 meters: "Dropped two wts," meaning drop weights, according to the Coast Guard.

All communications and tracking from the submersible to Polar Prince were lost at 3,346 meters, according to the Coast Guard.

I'm assuming a lot here, but dropping weights would likely mean they were trying to ascend. They may have had just over five meters' worth of knowing something was going wrong (whatever that means in terms of time) before the implosion.

[-] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

For an emergency ascent, they'd probably have dropped more than two. They also probably wouldn't have taken the time to type a message to the surface if it were going wrong that quickly.

It seems more likely to me that they were controlling their rare of descent. I'd expect them to lose a little buoyancy as the vessel compresses, so it seems reasonable that they'd drop the occasional weight as they descend.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Fair enough. That makes a lot of sense. I have heard that the failure model for this thing likely would have been some cracking sounds, and then the implosion, but I probably shouldn't speculate quite so hard. At any rate, the whole thing was a disaster waiting to happen, and whaddaya know, it did.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Frankly, it was probably cracking and pinging all the way down, even on normal dives. They had ~~steel~~ titanium outer caps on the ends, and carbon fiber in the middle, those two materials stretch and compress very differently under extreme loads.

[-] icedterminal@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The hubris the man had was so perfectly demonstrated in his interview.

"There's a rule you don't do that. Well I did."

And now he's dead.

this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
250 points (97.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
1778 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS