289
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 81 points 1 day ago
[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Half of those patents read like if they use vague enough language they can justify patenting how computers work.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

Welcome to Software Patents 101.

How can they let companies file such broad, vague patents for mechanics that have existed since forever? For example, 20240286040, is just what flying mounts have done in WoW since 2007 or even the flying cap in Mario 64 ffs. There are probably other earlier examples, but it goes to show that it's just noise to monopolize innovation and scare other devs.

[-] msgomez06@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Long story short, the claims get much longer and restrictive through the application process. The example you asked about is currently undergoing a non-final rejection, and the claims will get much more restrictive in further iterations (assuming that the application has actual merit somewhere in the original dependent claims)

You can check the application history here: Global Dossier

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago

My guess is the "Pokemon Box Storage" system since palworld stores pals in a palbox.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

Nintendo patents video game inventory system.

Not the onion.

(Not a patent lawyer, and I'm sure it's more complicated than that, but come on)

[-] Shadow@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Is that the wrong link? This seems totally unrelated to Pokemon in boxes, and is more about multi console character storage systems. This patent just sounds like someone described steam cloud saves in way too many big words.

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

In the "other references" they link to the bulbapedia article for Pokemon box so I figured thats what the whole thing was about, but yeah it does read like accessing data on a server

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

These can't be real, they read like they were generated by an AI prompt.

[-] testuserpleaseupvote@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, it makes me think that AI training was probably biased towards legal drivel like this, since it's public facing, professional and likely even translated in multiple languages.

The student got so good that people think the teacher is imitating it.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 3 points 21 hours ago

Those are just abstract if I'm not mistaken. There should be more detailed specifications.

[-] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Since this was filed in Japan, it would have to be patents Nintendo own in Japan that are infringed and those don't necessarily perfectly match those in the US

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
289 points (98.3% liked)

Games

31810 readers
1310 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS