79
submitted 2 days ago by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/earth@hexbear.net

Herbivores rock

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] abc@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

strong claim but I don't buy that triceratops were 'regularly destroying' tyrannosaurs. this is like saying walruses (the triceratops of the artic) regularly destroy polar bears (the tyrannosaurs of the artic) when really they have a toolkit meant to help delay or fend off attacks BUT THE POLAR BEAR ALWAYS COMES BACK.

[-] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Aren't Tyrannosaurs now regarded as scavengers, due to their short arms?

Less like a polar bear and more like a large-headed hyena.

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Those are completely different animals living in totally different niches. Triceratops weighed more than T. rex for a start and is far more agile than a walrus on land.

Also there are Rex skeletons that show gouging in the bones from triceratops horns.

Much like lions often die trying to kill buffalo or elephants, rex's would have been taking a huge gamble hunting triceratops. That's not to say Triceratops also didn't also die regularly to T. Rex.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
79 points (98.8% liked)

earth

12786 readers
58 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS