840
submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

i know, but it's what they claim to be

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I know. I just don't think they should be allowed to get away with calling themselves that unchallenged beyond the "and you call yourselves pro-life?" I feel the need to point out that they literally could not give less of a shit whether or not any given fetus lives or dies as long as medical intervention isn't required for the latter.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago
[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

On the one hand, I absolutely think it's worth calling out. On the other hand, they'll often be very quick to try and turn it around on you, calling anyone pro-choice pro-death or saying they "want to kill babies".

Obviously those aren't quite the same thing, but they see it as the same and I just wish there was a way to bridge that gap and have everyone listen to each other...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

At which point, I tell them that it's not about the fetus, it's about the fact that people have a fundamental right to their own bodies and no one should be allowed to use their body without their consent. Just like we have people consent to organ donation.

If they want fetuses to live, great. Start working on artificial womb technology. They don't seem interested.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago

Again, I agree with you. I just see the danger of refusing to acknowledge how a group conceptualizes their own position, even if they're being deliberately blind to other factors.

And I wish people could spend more effort trying to understand each other's perspectives, because otherwise how does it ever change?

I'm only barely talking about pro-life/anti-choice or pro-choice/pro-death here, too. The same kind of thinking and focusing on aspects the other person isn't addressing is everywhere in discourse these days. And a lot of them are very close to home for me and I guess I want them to be able to consider my perspective. But they won't, because they think of the world this way, so they see me as a problem and a problem-causer just by being me.

Any way... Rant over I guess

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

How does it ever change? The 70+% of people that disagree show up to vote. I was raised by forced birthers and have been to family therapy with them to try to talk with a neutral third party. The therapist gave us all a blanket statement that we'll never change each other's minds. So, fine. My brother and I just have to cancel out their votes and get more people to tip the scales.

Every state that's been able to vote on it has upheld protections for abortion. More are on the ballot for November. Check your state and be ready to show up.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

How does it ever change?

I don't know. But I'm going to keep trying.

I'm definitely going to vote, and everyone willing to listen should hear why, like you said.

But I'm also going to keep talking and listening to the people I disagree with, and nuts to your therapist.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
840 points (98.6% liked)

News

23424 readers
1600 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS