303
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wagesj45@fedia.io -1 points 2 months ago

Again, I'm asking what, in a perfect world where this kind of protection existed, would happen if two people had similar (or identical) sounding voices? Which entity would gain the legal rights and protections?

[-] Fontasia@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

Impersonating exists, the difference there is if someone was impersonates you and says something defamatory, you can sue that person, what this article is suggesting is if I made an AI model of your voice I am not liable for anything I make that voice say

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

I never argued that you can't sue for implied endorsement or defamation. That is illegal. What isn't legal is owning a voice outright. You're conflating the two.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

There is no impersonation so good that it is totally indistinguishable from the person being impersonated when seriously analyzed.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
303 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59670 readers
2259 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS