840
submitted 2 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] myliltoehurts@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

Not a lawyer but in the scenario where proton closed the source but kept offering the build, even if gpl3 still applies since they're the only copyright holder (no contributions) it'd only give them grounds to sue themselves?

From gnu.org:

The GNU licenses are copyright licenses; free licenses in general are based on copyright. In most countries only the copyright holders are legally empowered to act against violations.

[-] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh, yes but the DRM exemption clause means that you can backwards engineer the changes and continue releasing them under GPL

Edit: as an example we should probably be looking at the duckststion situation evolving right now:

https://vimuser.org/duckstation.html

Oh that is a SHAME.

DuckStation is such a wonderful piece of software too. :(

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
840 points (99.8% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
344 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS