43

Just a quick shower thought (I am literally typing this in the shower)

I think it might hit closer to home, because the insult (accusing someone of being loyal to the empire) is less abstract than insulting someone for having an unscientific world-view. Another benefit is that it makes us seem less like conservatives, and is harder to coopt by patsocs.

Obviously, the insult will probably only become effective if it spreads so that people know what is being referred to. And obviously, liberalism is still a menace.

What do you guys think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

patriot (derogatory) is better but liberals think there's a difference between that and rightwing nationalism so i don't think it's vey cutting

[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago
[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago

I don't know why I forgot the existence of "nationalist". But I think "citizen" is also a little different. The former implies an ideology, the latter implies a willingness to be part of imperial machinations, even if unwittingly.

[-] whogivesashit@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I agree with this. Cause citizen is something military bros and wannabes say unironically. Patriot or nationalist gets to heart of it better I think

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
43 points (95.7% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
1063 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS