43
Europe cracks down after rise in 'direct action' climate protests
(www.reuters.com)
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
Read up on the history of... any emancipatory movement, really. Civil disobedience, strikes, direct action, have all involved some forms of violence (be it so-called vandalism, or direct confrontation between groups). Many in reaction to violence by the state or corporations (Battle of Blair Mountain!). Thinking we will achieve far-reaching goals without resorting to some sort of radical actions is ludicrous.
You're also supposing that this climate crisis that the governments are currently inflicting on their people is not violence. And that the police beating protesters is not violence.
It is violence, and we should be able to defend ourselves.
It blows my mind that more people don't realize that police presence is a symptom of lack of representation. Healthy, content, and comfortable individual don't need to be policed. Discontent comes from injustice.
This is a summary of an idea developed by Helder Camara
Violence happens to people, not property.
Direct action against climate change turns violent when the state uses violence to stop it.
Bringing violence to bear against a situation is how states excersize power, because the power of the state IS literally just the ability to deploy violence.
Can we not use ableist slurs here please