97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Civility@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago

This is not a communist perspective.

This is just a national chauvinist perspective.

You’re arguing that the actions of the PRC state made the PRC state safer and more powerful.

Others are arguing that this was done at the expense of the power, well-being and lives of dozens of other communist parties and hundreds of millions of working people they represented. That the PRC may have gained power but Communists as a whole lost it and millions of workers were betrayed into abject poverty and left at the mercy of rapacious capitalist imperialists in the process.

Simply saying “but it worked the PRC state did get safer and more powerful by betraying hundreds of millions of workers to the depredations of capital” isn’t something any communist should be happy with.

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
780 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS