58
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
58 points (96.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43942 readers
473 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Hard copy.
Photos in a photo album, documents in a filing cabinet.
Okay but like what if your house burns down
It's good to have some kind of backup for worst case scenarios
Otherwise I totally agree. I feel like the only way I'll actually look at my photos is if they're physically there for me to see.
This is why I'm scanning in all my old physical photos. It's great to go through the originals, but if anything was to happen, they'd be gone forever.
What scanner do you use?
It's an Epson Stylus, 235w I think. I'm not home to check at the moment. It's not amazing, but it scans at up to either 1200 or 2400 dpi, and I usually use 600 dpi, as that's more than enough for the typically low quality photos I've got.
I'm sticking with it on Windows for now too, as the software can do some corrections with one click, like certain colour corrections. I've tried a few Linux packages, and while they're good, they're all missing something compared to the Epson Windows software.