638

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3613920

https://archive.ph/tR7s6

Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked

“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”

"But I still want to get paid for it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thanks for demonstrating what a useless term "AI" is when you're not trying to sell snake oil.

[-] aiccount 0 points 2 months ago

Every word in every language changes over time. The term AI changing is the absolute normal. It's not some mark against it.

Current llms are phenomenally beneficial for some things. Millions of developers have had their entire careers completely changed. Teachers are able to grade work in 10% of the time. Children through to college students and anyone interested in learning have infinitely patient tutors on demand 24 hours a day. The fact that you are completely clueless about what is going on doesn't by any stretch of the imagination mean it isn't happening. It just means that you not only feel like you are "beyond learning", it also means that you don't even have people in your life that are still interested in personal growth, or you are too shallow to have conversations with anyone who is.

This is just beginning. The more you cling to being in denial of progress, the further you will get behind. You are denying any mode of transportation other than horses even exists, while people are routinely flying around the world. It most likely won't be too long until your mindset is widely accepted as a mental disorder.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 months ago

Every word in every language changes over time. The term AI changing is the absolute normal. It's not some mark against it.

Lumping machine learning algorithms, llms, regressive learning, search algorithms all in one bucket and calling it "AI" serves no proper purpose. There is no consensus, it's not a clear definition, it's not convenient and it only helps sell bullshit. Llms aren't intelligent. Calling them that is the opposite of useful.

Current llms are phenomenally beneficial for some things.

Namely: the portfolio of tech shareholders and grifters.

Millions of developers have had their entire careers completely changed.

Lol, no. What's your source for this?

Teachers are able to grade work in 10% of the time.

Poor students.

Children through to college students and anyone interested in learning have infinitely patient tutors on demand 24 hours a day.

Have you heard of the stories where students believed some AI bullshit more than what their teacher told them? Great "tutor" you have there.

The fact that you are completely clueless about what is going on

Sure, bud. /s

It just means that you not only feel like you are "beyond learning", it also means that you don't even have people in your life that are still interested in personal growth, or you are too shallow to have conversations with anyone who is.

Oh, please tell me more about my life, stranger on the internet! /s

What an asshole, seriously.

Have fun in your tech cult, you ableist bootlicker.

[-] aiccount 0 points 2 months ago

There is a reason why you point to examples from years ago, that's because that is where you are still stuck.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago

Students "correcting" their teachers on AI bullshit isn't "from years ago".

Old examples of AI I counted used to be the bleeding edge of AI research. Now they're an old hat. The same thing will happen to LLMs. And LLMs won't lead to so-called "AGI", just like the other examples didn't.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
638 points (95.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12544 readers
1063 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS