368
Nintendo Switch Modder Who Refused to Shut Down Now Takes to Court Against Nintendo Without a Lawyer (www.ign.com)
submitted 1 week ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 185 points 1 week ago

As reported by Torrent Freak, Ryan Daly, the alleged owner of modding company Modded Hardware, has denied any wrongdoing in court — even that he owns and operates the business at all.

Daly mostly responded to the lawsuit's claims by saying "denied" and otherwise claimed he lacked "sufficient information to either admit or deny the allegations." His defenses include fair use, invalid copyrights, a lack of standing, fraudulent inducement, an arbitration clause, failure to state a claim, and unjust enrichment.

This guy sounds halfway to SovCit and entirely fucked.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this has all the ear markings of a sovcit....

[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

whats sovcit

[-] sevan@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement

Morons who think their country's laws don't apply to them.

[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

oooh that's interesting there is something similar in germany too

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

sovereign citizen

basically people who think the legal system has hidden cheat codes, and if you can say the magic words then all of a sudden certain laws no longer apply to you

[-] Nojustice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

My guess is "sovereign citizen"

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Based on what?

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago
  1. He's going to court without a lawyer, which is always always always a bad idea (I wish that weren't the case but it is a fact);
  2. He's tried to claim he doesn't own or operate the business in question;
  3. His defenses are spaghetti thrown at the wall:

His defenses include fair use, invalid copyrights, a lack of standing, fraudulent inducement, an arbitration clause, failure to state a claim, and unjust enrichment.

Many of these (in fact, all but the arbitration clause; that's probably from their TOS but won't save him) are SovCit arguments and simply do not apply. They're going to be dismantled in seconds in court, and I know that with at best a slightly-better-than-layperson understanding of the law. This guy is going to get thoroughly Bowser'd.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Pro se parties often get a more relaxed interpretation of their arguments because they can't be expected to know everything about the law unlike an attorney. If there's a chance that any of those arguments has merit then the judge will allow it.

this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
368 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16521 readers
679 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works