18
submitted 19 hours ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Much credit to this post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 9 points 18 hours ago

LMAO at the amount of "her entire career has been about building and filling internment camps, but at least she doesn't have the popular support for a soft coup!" in this thread.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 3 points 14 hours ago

A federal prosecutor has always dedicated her career to building "internment camps" but a literal coup that led to several deaths was "soft"?

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 hours ago

I can't tell which you're trying to do, apologize for maga chuds or kamala's abuse of black people and immigrants.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 0 points 8 hours ago

That's right where I want to be. So on the fence you frustratingly want me to just pick any side.

But for your own sanity sake, I prefer to side with society freedoms. I'm too young and broke to care about tax brackets or inflation rate.

[-] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 3 points 10 hours ago

Several deaths:

six people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, three died of natural causes, and a police officer died after being assaulted by rioters.

I'll admit it may technically be a mischaracterization, but I don't think you understand the level of violence that is typical of "hard" coups.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 1 points 8 hours ago

I just disagree with softening the word by adding "soft" at the beginning. A soft coup is a coup. Date rape is still rape, candy-corn-murder is still murder. No need to add prefixes to try and categorize them, and artificially make some sort of hierarchy.

By naming it any less than a coup, and holding all coups to the same standard, it's an attempt to soften it, and I am against that.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
18 points (64.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7166 readers
803 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS