19
submitted 17 hours ago by dessalines@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

Much credit to this post.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

excellent post 🫡

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

how many felonies did she commit?

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago

Its not illegal to disproportionately imprison black people for minor drug offenses in the USA, just like slavery was and remains very legal there.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Well worth it to actually click through and read some of the specific articles on topics of interest. The descriptions are not all accurate.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Many of these are about a case of a man supposedly throwing a knife under a car, for instance. "A crime he didn't commit" is inaccurate, it remained very much in question.

https://laist.com/news/kpcc-archive/san-fernando-valley-man-s-freedom-hangs-in-appeal

Really, I recommend reading through any that strike your interest, and not simply trusting the one-shot summaries provided by a random person on the internet.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Many of these are about a case of a man supposedly throwing a knife under a car, for instance.

So far as I can tell, a single bullet point is about this, just with multiple links.

"A crime he didn't commit" is inaccurate, it remained very much in question.

It's a claim straight from one of the links and I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that a conviction based solely on cop testimony, later contradicted by other witnesses, with an incompetent defending lawyer that was later disbarred, is plenty enough to make that claim.

Really, I recommend reading through any that strike your interest, and not simply trusting the one-shot summaries provided by a random person on the internet.

Sure, but read them critically and not with a pro-cop bias.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nick@midwest.social 10 points 16 hours ago

Yes, she sucks in her own ways. But she’s not a fascist.

[-] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

Do you consider Arabs to be inhuman?

If not, care to explain?

If so, I think I found the fascist.

[-] nick@midwest.social 0 points 7 hours ago
[-] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago
[-] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

....So is that a yes? If you respond to the question "hey, are you racist?" like that, I think we both know what that means.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 10 points 12 hours ago

A nationalist "tough on crime" anti-socialist with a deep appreciation for cops-for-capitalism pining for a return to "glory days" for a subset of residents while scapegoating others via racist and xenophobic policies? While pushing a genocide? Whose supporters can't even name the parts of her platform that appeal to them, instead trying to build a cult of personality and identify through who they reject?

To the extent anyone is fascist any longer she's right up there. But she uses rhetoric that is normalized for liberals and flies under the radar because the oppression she supports is sanitized and "politely" obfuscated.

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 12 points 15 hours ago

Oh? I don't remember having the option of voting for her in the primary.

I wanted Biden. Still voting for him, he's the only one who can beat trump.

[-] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 16 hours ago

She is tho. Committing genocide is fascism

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

No, she's much, much worse, mostly because Russia needs Trump to stop weapons supplies to Ukraine again like he did last time.

[-] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 9 points 16 hours ago

LMAO at the amount of "her entire career has been about building and filling internment camps, but at least she doesn't have the popular support for a soft coup!" in this thread.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 3 points 12 hours ago

A federal prosecutor has always dedicated her career to building "internment camps" but a literal coup that led to several deaths was "soft"?

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

I can't tell which you're trying to do, apologize for maga chuds or kamala's abuse of black people and immigrants.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago

That's right where I want to be. So on the fence you frustratingly want me to just pick any side.

But for your own sanity sake, I prefer to side with society freedoms. I'm too young and broke to care about tax brackets or inflation rate.

[-] SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org 2 points 8 hours ago

Several deaths:

six people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, three died of natural causes, and a police officer died after being assaulted by rioters.

I'll admit it may technically be a mischaracterization, but I don't think you understand the level of violence that is typical of "hard" coups.

[-] Mambert@beehaw.org 2 points 5 hours ago

I just disagree with softening the word by adding "soft" at the beginning. A soft coup is a coup. Date rape is still rape, candy-corn-murder is still murder. No need to add prefixes to try and categorize them, and artificially make some sort of hierarchy.

By naming it any less than a coup, and holding all coups to the same standard, it's an attempt to soften it, and I am against that.

[-] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 9 points 16 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
19 points (65.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7166 readers
861 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS