121

The only reason not to do so is the vanishingly rare chance that democrats turn a red state, which is basically the exact same argument they use to tell people to vote blue no matter who, but more compelling because it's not typical genocidal am*rican politicians they're voting for.

What are they going to do? Tell you they want to vote for a war criminal on principle? The positive political pressure of having a somewhat popular socialist party far outweighs the small chance democrats could have won (and this is even from their perspective, that the democrats winning would fix everything somehow)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Des@hexbear.net 33 points 9 hours ago

in some states they are just listed as two women with no party affiliation so use that how you will

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 44 points 9 hours ago

Why vote for Kamala L3Harris and Wehrmacht Walz when you can vote for TWO women? That's twice the feminism!

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
121 points (99.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13484 readers
878 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS